I would have to disagree this is an integrity issue. If a site decides to void these wagers as a goodwill gesture this is of course a bonus to you. However, it doesn’t show a lack of integrity to simply follow rules and grade wagers as they are stated and intended to be graded. There are a number of wagers where we have in the past provided some goodwill and perhaps with some feedback they will consider it here, but again, the wager is technically graded correctly.
However did they void only losing wagers or winning ones as well? In the case you noted above if they voided these wagers and pulled them from those who had Cincinnati to win, I’m sure there were quite a number of players who wagered on Cinci that were unhappy with this decision. Unless the rules did clearly state that this was the intended way this would be graded.
A lack of integrity would be something that clearly goes against our rules, which this does not. Not that that makes it any less frustrating.