Reference #23021690431333
Since when does the dead heat rule not apply for this situation? It’s been the case every other time. Max Homa is tied with Keith Mitchell at -7
The amount received is correct as it does comply with the dead heat rule. As the potential win amount is always divided by the number of tied participants.
Odds were even money, $295 to win $295, two players tied which would result in a win of $147.50
It would be $590.00 divided by two as two players tied making $295.00.
So on 2/11/2023 ref#23021686159826 I bet on Scotty Scheffler $25.59 to win $255.90, but WON $140.74 because he tied with Adam Hadwin ref#23021686611071 where I bet $86.26 to win $280.34, but WON 183.30.
I should have WON 147.50 for ref#23021690431333
You won $140.74 as you risked $25.59 to win $255.90, which is a total of $281.49 which divided by two gives the same amount we awarded you. If you use the same math you will notice the amount you received is correct. The examples you provided only proves that the wager is correctly settled.
1 Like
Risking $295 to win $295 would mean I collect/am awarded $590, in this case two people tied, so you divide the original win amount of $295 by 2, leaving a WIN amount of $147.50, to COLLECT 437.50
If 3 ppl would have tied it would have been a win of $98.33, pay out of $393.33
That is not the case, not even with the examples you provided above. It is always half of both the risk and win amount, not just the potential win amount.