It’s a dead heat so the payout is correct. Unfortunately it’s not treated as a stand alone event, seeing that there are several winners.
so the fact that it’s a dead heat means:
- the odds for the win is split by number of winnera (which i understand) but ALSO
- the winnings from that dead heat is NOT carried forward as part of the parlay?
I can’t see any reference to #2 in the deadheat rules.
it’s currently being treated as two separate bets (the dead heat and a two way parlay) which obviously pays a lot less than a three way parlay.
appreciate any further explanation you can give here?
the way i see this one is…
The dead heat odds are divided by 6 winners +575/6 = +98.53 odds
$50 parlay @ +98.53 odds, +102 odds and +300 odds = $752.06
If I’m wrong here happy to shown how wrong I am! thanks
I bet under 220 on gsw vs pelican but marked as loss. Please help
Ref: 24102016042095
Resettled as a win, apologies for the delayed response.
May you confirm why?
Jeremy Sochan finished with 2 steals and the line was listed as “2” and not “1.5”. Please see the attached picture.
So he didn’t get under 2 then!
Yes So I’m saying it’s a push. If the line was listed at 1.5 then yes it lost. But it was listed at 2. This has always been a push. No idea why all of a sudden it’s not.
I will check with sports to be sure.
For example, this would be the same thing if a game total was set at over/under 200 and the final score was 101-99. That is ALWAYS graded out as a push. It’s the same thing here since the line was listed at 2 steals and NOT 1.5 steals.
This has been re-settled for you now
1 Like
@Paul_Bovada thank you. Please ask them to resettle the following as well:
Ref. 24102016695270
Same as before, Jeremy Sochan finished with exactly 2 steals and Zach Edey finished with exactly 1 steal, therefore, this is a push.
Will send it over for you
1 Like
Should be good now
1 Like