Have another moderator read this thread. Obviously this is way too difficult for you to understand. Because if i had the under live in that situation it would have alresdy been graded as no action unsettled error line! You cant have it both ways!
The wager is a winning one
Wrongly settled as a push
Player already won the first set, which makes this bet a winning one.
Reference number - 24112030927084
Having a look at the wager.
The wager correctly settled as per:
- Set Betting: In the event of a retirement or disqualification, all bets will be voided. If the specified number of sets are changed, bets will also be void.
@Mikey
The set spreads +1.5 means if the player will win atleast one set.
And these bets are winning wagers as soon as the player wins atleast one set.
That’s how Bovada had been grading them for years.
I won and lost 100s of these bets on Bovada being graded irrespective of the players retirement.
The money line bets had always been “Void” in case the player retires.
Set spreads are settled differently and I am pretty sure that’s what the Tennis team will suggest you if you reach out to them. Like I said, I had atleast 100s of bets settled that way on Bovada for the past years since I had been with Bovada.
That’s incorrect he would have to win two set as it plus 1.5. Therefore this would make this a loss. Your funds were returned to you as the other player retired. The wager is correctly settled.
Other than these 4 tournaments (Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon, US Open) all other tennis matches in this world play only 3 sets.
Which means the player who wins 2 sets will win th match.
This is a 3 set match.
If the other player in this match even wins the match after losing the 1st set, which means he wins the next 2.
That will make him have 2 sets.
The player I bet on already won 1 set.
So please explain how +1.5 set spread is a loss??
I sincerely advise you to check the facts before saying something, rather than just saying anything.
I had been seeing this more and more from Bovada nowadays and this is unacceptable. @moderators
You might be handling multiple sports and multiple accounts. But for me, Tennis is a sport which I live atleast 10+ hours a day either playing, watching or betting here.
So I advise you to respect my knowledge and talk accordingly and correct yourself wherever necessary.
The other set was not completed, which means that the total set expectations that the wager was placed for was not met. This would make the wager being voided a correct move as per the rules I have stated prior.
I am done.
This is the final nail on my patience levels.
I will take time finding wagers of set spread when player retired and how they are graded at that time, & will send snapshots of how it was graded previously along with your answer to the email.
And I will post the explanation here and will see what answer I will get.
My mistake even to come here in the first place.
If I find wagers that are previously graded differently that how you had written here; what answer will you have to say??
Please share the wager so we can make the comparison.
Give me 24 hours and I will find not one, but every similar wager that got graded differently than how you explained here.
This discussion is beyond my money now.
I will find them just to prove a point.
Can yall push the saint peters wagers through ref number 24112031025827
Checking on this right now.
This was settled.
Checking on the wager.
Checking on the wager.
The wager is correctly settled as you team had to win both half time and full time, and since they did not win full time the wager was graded as a loss.