I have escalated this now.
Unfortunately @Redwood Wagers on props have action as there is no option to pick pitchers in these line bets. Therefore, the wager is correctly settled.
Says all wagers
@Redwood for baseball wagering you can refer to our rules here
Only game lines such as runline and totals would be voided. Moneylines would depend on on choosing action or listed pitchers.
All other wagers have action unless its player specific like Eovaldi to strike out x amount of batters.
Okay… Thanks
Yea bayern got exactly 4 corners. So not sure if 2nd half they score and plus 4 corners how that would be graded
Thanks Matty
4+ should include 4. So anything 4 and above is usually how that is interpreted.
Perfect. Thanks!
Ref. 21041304271725
This game has been over for a while can I please get this back graded. Thank you
Good fellas & ladies of mods, please grade my parlay
21041304493164
Thanks!
Checking now.
Escalated now, it should be settled shortly.
I’ve contacted Bovada customer service multiple times now to get wager #21041303956353 corrected from No Action/Push to a win. Each time the sports team has shown incompetence by simply saying the wager should be No Action because of a retirement in the third set. However, according to Bovada’s tennis Rule 2 and 5 attached, the wager should be graded because the market in question (game spread) was already decided at the time of retirement.
Fruhvirtova was +6 on the game spread handicap; she won the first set 6-2 (4 game win), lost the second set 7-6 (1 game loss), and therefore headed to the third set with a 3 game lead. Even if she lost the third set 6-0 (worst possible set loss in tennis), she still would have covered the +6 game spread. However, even at that the retirement occurred at 4-4 in the third set meaning the worst she could have lost that set was 6-4 or 7-5 by 2 games. Therefore, she actually won the total games by 1 even though the match didn’t finish. The game spread was a decided market at the time of retirement and should be graded accordingly.




